A settlement being discussed in an antitrust lawsuit against the NCAA and major college conferences could cost billions and pave the way for a compensation model for college athletes.
An agreement has not been finalized and many questions remain unanswered. It is also unclear if new rules could withstand further legal scrutiny, but it appears college sports is heading down a revolutionary path with at least some schools directly paying athletes to participate. Here’s what is known and what still needs to be figured out:
House vs. NCAA is a class-action federal lawsuit seeking damages for athletes who were denied the opportunity to earn money from use of their name, image or likeness going back to 2016. The plaintiffs, including former Arizona State swimmer Grant House, are also asking the court to rule that NIL compensation should include billions of dollars in media rights fees that go to the NCAA and the wealthiest conferences (Big Ten, Big 12, Atlantic Coast and Southeastern), mostly for football and basketball.
Related articles:
Related suggestion:
Former New York Giants player Aaron Thomas, who caught 35 touchdown passes, dies at 86Local elections 2024: Full results show which parties won in YOUR areaKris Kim makes cut at the Nelson. The 16Former security guard Jake Knapp leads the Byron Nelson after 2 roundsKris Kim makes cut at the Nelson. The 16A tornado hit an Oklahoma newsroom built in the 1920s. The damage isn't stopping the pressesReign snap 5King Charles' longtime charity celebrates new name and US expansion at New York galaPat Beverley throws ball at Pacers fans, kicks reporter out of lockerDua Lipa's 'Radical Optimism' review: Controlled but catchy dance pop
0.2764s , 6491.4296875 kb
Copyright © 2024 Powered by Paying college athletes appears closer than ever. How could it work and what stands in the way? ,Global Gaze news portal